Skip to main content

Bhakti and Tantra intertwined: the explorations of the Tamil Poetess Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār


Towards contributing to historical understanding and theorizing of the relationships between bhakti and Tantra, this article analyzes their intersection in the poetry of the Tamil Śaiva saint, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār. This poet-saint is dated by scholars to 550 CE and is understood by Tamil Śiva-bhakti tradition to have been the earliest bhakti devotee to Śiva in a group that includes dozens of named others. However, her bhakti vision is distinctive in that she foregrounds the cremation ground in her poetry. Investigating the cultural literary context for her choice, this paper argues that she intertwines bhakti and Tantra in her formulations. While Tamil literature established a contrast between nāṭu (town) and kāṭu (cremation ground) and included Buddhist exploration of the religious significance of kāṭu, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s nearest of kin is the Śaiva Tantrikas. Historically, she stands at the juncture between the established Atimārga and the developing Mantramārga Tantric groups, whose ritual practices represented the cremation ground as a potent place to access Śiva. Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s poetry concords with that view, but her emphasis is on an exploratory, unscripted encounter with the divine. Her poetry suggests a period of fluidity between the paths of bhakti and Tantra prior to their overlapping yet contested developments in the medieval period.


It has been my premise for quite some time that bhakti brings together elements that other Indian traditions do not normally intertwine; for example, the sannyāsin ethos and the householder identity; intellection and emotion; spiritual salvation and ordinary embodiment, and the particularly Tamil literary conceptions of akam (interior) and pu r am (exterior) (Prentiss 1999: 3–41, 52–54). That is, bhakti recognizes a duality, but this duality is not conceptualized as a binary. Rather, a duality is what makes a transformational meeting of different entities possible, which is encoded in the term bhakti, with its emphasis on the human act of sharing. A person who engages bhakti shares an identity with the divine, a guru, and/or a beloved in a relation that I have conceptualized in my earlier and subsequent work as ‘participation’, reframing the much-discussed religious path of bhakti in scholarship from its static definition of ‘devotion’ to a multidimensional characterization of it as ‘devotional participation’. This humanistic emphasis unlocks bhakti as a history of doing—interpretive thought, literary and musical composition, performance, community—and an active locus of distinctive constructions of identity. Using a literary historical method, what I argue in this paper is that bhakti’s participatory impulse was forged in dialogue with Śaiva Tantrism.

Also in my earlier work, I noted connections between bhakti and Tantra on the issue of duality: “Unlike Advaita Vedanta, which is dismissive of duality, bhakti and tantra tend to explore this pervasive modality of human consciousness through sophisticated philosophies on the dynamic interplay among aspects of human life and thought. The worldview is that of a unity, but one that is in motion” (Pechilis 2004: 19). I noted that both bhakti and Tantra valorize a diversity of embodied experience as spiritually meaningful, and that they both include the feminine as religiously significant. My current work is an early stage of research on such connections between bhakti and Tantra. Poetry attributed to the sixth-century Tamil bhakti poet-saint Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār may represent an illuminating intersection between the two because, in addition to the resonances I have already mentioned, her poetry designates the cremation ground or kāṭu as a significant place of spiritual practice. Tantra’s explicit and uncommon bringing together of the cremation ground and spiritual practice provided an influential context for the poet-saint Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s bhakti imaginary.Footnote 1

The Cremation Ground: Tamil Sources

There are four poetic compositions attributed to Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār; of course there are questions of historicity and authorship, but evidence from the authoritative 12th-century biography of her by Cēkkilār indicates that tradition has attributed these poems to her for nearly 1,000 years. Her two shortest are two sets of hymns of eleven verses (patikam), which are distinctive from her much longer poems in that they seemingly provide an eyewitness account of Śiva dancing at the cremation ground in each of their verses save the concluding signature verses. Here is an example:

In the thickest darkness

of the dead of night

desiccated white pods of the vākai shrub rattle,

birds of prey screech

and an alarmed owl flutters on a branch.

In this cremation ground,

dancing elegantly on the flames

shadowed by dense chaparral,

our father resides at Tiru Ālaṅkāṭu. (Tiruvālaṅkāṭut Tiruppatikam 1.3)Footnote 2

In this and other verses, the cremation ground is portrayed as a menacing place, only partially illuminated by a flickering chiaroscuro and haunted by sudden movements and eerie sounds of flora and fauna; and yet this is the place where Śiva resides, elegantly dancing. My question is: Why did she set her vision of Śiva as the dancer in the cremation ground? What were her sources? With what cultural meanings was her work intersecting?

The specified location of her vision is indicated by the phrase ‘Tiru Ālaṅkāṭu’ (also spelled Tiruvālaṅkāṭu), which appears as a refrain in only one of the sets of eleven verses, though tradition refers to both sets as ‘the verses on Tiruvālaṅkāṭu’ (Tiruvālaṅkāut Tiruppatikam). Since the eleventh century, as evidenced by the Tiruvalangadu copper plates issued by Rajendra Chola, up until today, the phrase is understood to be the name of a town some 50 km west of Chennai.Footnote 3 Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār may or may not have meant it as a proper noun, because the meaning of the phrase is ‘sacred – tiru + banyan – alam + forest - kāṭu’ and her hymns clearly emphasize the setting of Śiva’s dance as wild and untamed (kāṭu).

The term kāṭu or forest/cremation ground has a long history in classical Tamil literature; the Caṅkam poetry, which predated Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār by some three to six centuries, tended to treat the cremation ground or kāṭu as a meme in binary opposition to the social world. The Pu r anā n ū r u anthology, for example, represents kāṭu as a place on the other side of a boundary that one can cross only once: It is synonymous with death. Bards lament their own loss of livelihood when a great patron dies, such as in this song of Peruñ-cittir-anār when his patron Veḷimān had died:

He has gone to the burial ground in the forest where the male

of the kite with its red ears and the pokuval bird and the crow

with its strong beak and the owl perch without fear near the curving

surface of the red burial urn set down into the earth,

and then move wherever they please in the company of a pack

of ghouls! He who once loved to drink toddy!Footnote 4

In other poems from the anthology, spouses lament that their beloveds have gone to “the lonely burning ground” that is “on the salty earth all overgrown with sedge.”Footnote 5 It is a place of rupture and loss, informed by but in contrast to nāṭu, which is a person-centric, contextual term meaning a culturally-defined place of social existence, aspiration, and prosperity (Daniel 1984: 68). In one of her Tiruvālaṅkāṭu verses, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār describes those who bear the bier to the cremation ground as “agitated and unable to comprehend” (punti kalaṅki mati mayaṅki, 1.10), and yet in one of her Tiruvālaṅkāṭu signature verses she claims that she “thrives” at the burning ground (kāṭu malinta, 2.11). Thus, she chooses to exist at a place that is the negation of human existence: Why does she view the burning ground as a place to linger?

In my book-length study, I wanted to emphasize Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s self-identity as a Tamil poet, and so along with the Caṅkam poetry I considered her references to the cremation ground in relation to the Tamil epic, the Māṇimēkalai (Pechilis 2011: 72–3). Briefly, for the epic heroine the cremation ground reveals the cycle of birth and death that Buddhist knowledge and practice overcome. In contrast, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s two hymns on Tiruvālaṅkāṭu suggest that at the cremation ground she comes face to face with the lord of time himself who dances eternally.Footnote 6

My current research focuses on the Śaiva milieu—what was going on in Śaivism around 550 CE, which is when a consensus of scholars dates Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār (Pechilis 2013: 136–7; see also Rajarajan 2014: 200). To locate her in the Śaiva milieu I will go farther afield than literature in Tamil; part of my justification for doing so is that in her two longer poems Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār indicates that she is very familiar with the Sanskrit purāṇic mythology of Śiva, especially Śiva as the Bearer of the Gaṅga River, Śiva as the Bearer of Poison, Śiva as the Destroyer of the Triple Cities, Śiva as the Beggar, and Śiva as the Dancer.Footnote 7

The Cremation Ground: Tantric Sources

According to Alexis Sanderson, in the period between the Mauryas and the Guptas worship of Śiva was “common and widespread in the population, and that this was the case throughout the subcontinent” (Sanderson 2013: 222–23; see also Sanderson 2009: 44).Footnote 8 Such traditions of lay devotion were characterized by the attainment of “success and security in this life and, after death, the finite reward of ascension to the deity’s paradise (śivalokaḥ, rudralokaḥ), followed, once the merit that earned that reward has been exhausted, by the most desirable of incarnations in the human world. They claim, moreover, that the rewards of adherence extend in various degrees to the devotee’s patriline and dependents” (Sanderson 2013: 212). Out of this lay devotional substratum, specific initiatory traditions of Śaivism developed from the second century to the fifth century CE, which later tradition grouped as Atimārgas: The Pāñcārthika Pāśupatas, the Lākulas or Kālamukhas, and the Kāpālikas or Mahāvratins as adherents of the Somasiddhānta. All of these initiatory traditions considered themselves to be superior to the devotional laity by “offering the individual alone the attainment of the non-finite goal of liberation (mokṣaḥ)” (Sanderson 2013: 212). From the middle of the fifth century and into the sixth, further initiatory traditions developed, including the Mantramārga or ‘Tantric Śaivism’, which developed on the basis of the Kālamukhas and the Kāpālikas, and the Śakta Kulamārga, which developed specifically from the Kāpālikas. These later traditions “promised not only liberation, but for those initiates consecrated to office, the ability to accomplish supernatural effects (siddhiḥ).”Footnote 9 Within this large-relief history, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār is located at the juncture between the Atimārga proto-Tantra sects and the emergence of the Mantramārga or ‘Tantric Śaivism’.

Sanderson specifically points to the Atimārga concept of liberation as “non-finite” to contrast it with its context of lay devotion: For the Atimārga, mokṣa is a lasting state, and not merit that will become exhausted. Sanderson notes that the Kālamukhas and Kāpālikas practiced rituals associated with death. I will elaborate here that such rituals are a logical component of a worldview in which the boundary between ‘finite’ and ‘non-finite’ has been disassembled. In contrast to their lay devotion context, the Atimārga sects did not view liberation as repeating a cycle that resonates with that of birth and death; instead, the finite and the non-finite were understood to intersect in embodied humankind and effect liberation from the rebirth cycle. The way to manifest this intersection was to exist in a manner that engaged cultural signs of non-existence, especially in emulation of Śiva as Bhairava.

Such practices at the cremation ground appear in the pañcārtha system of the Pāśupata, which was “open only to regenerate Brahman men already initiated into vedic tradition;” cremation ground practices constitute a fourth phase of the path, in which the renouncer “lives in the cremation ground on whatever he finds, reciting the mantras until his death and liberation. This means that the fourth stage culminates in the actual death of the Pāśupata” (Acharya 2012). The Atimārga sects emphasized ritual in their practice, including initiation, the wearing—or in their terms “bathing in”—ashes, and begging with a skull as a bowl as Bhairava is imagined to do.Footnote 10

Ritual details are described in Kāpālika practice in the Brahmayāmala, which scholars consider to be an early Śaiva Tantric text (though it may have a date as late as the ninth century):

A cluster of chapters (46–48 [of the Brahmayāmala]), the same ones that also prescribe the mahāvrata and promise possession by Bhairava, describe cremation-ground practices that could well come, at least partly, from the Soma-Kāpālikas. Each chapter involves a conversation with Bhairava and/or other deities or creatures. The first of these chapters (46) is called Mahāmanthāna (The Great Churning). The churning is performed in the cremation ground and preceded by the worship of nine skulls arranged on a maṇḍala and filled with blood, alcohol (madirā), and the mingled sexual fluids (picu). For the churning, which is carried out on top of a corpse, the practitioner must use materials obtained on the spot: the ad hoc pavilion that he constructs is made of human bones, the vessel used is fashioned of clay that he finds in the cremation ground, the churning stick is a large bone such as the tibia, and the rope is made of human hair and intestines taken from the dead. The rite mainly consists of acting out the cosmic churning of gods and demons in its cremation-ground version (Törzsök 2012).Footnote 11

The Cremation Ground: Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s Bhakti View

The diversity of sources that describe the cremation ground as a locus of religious practice suggest that while it was a domain avoided and uncontested by the ordinary social world, which contrasted cultivated social place (nāṭu) with uncultivated wild place (kāṭu), the cremation ground (kāṭu in Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s poetry) was very much a contested place among Tantrikas, bhāktas, and Buddhists, among others, and thus served as a resonant zone for articulating distinctive soteriological paths.

The Atimārga proto-Tantrikas and the early Mantramārga Tantrikas predate Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār, and as Śaivas they are her nearest of kin. The importance of Śaiva Tantra’s valorization of ‘being there’ at the cremation ground cannot be overstated in transforming a culturally-perceived wasteland into a progressive domain; Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s emphasis on the potency of the cremation ground is in accord with it and also in dialogue with it. Unlike the Tantrikas, she is not at the cremation ground in imitation of Śiva as Bhairava: All of her poems on Tiruvālaṅkāṭu are set in the cremation ground, but none of them depict Śiva in his fearsome beggar form; instead, they depict him as a dancer. In her longest poem, the A r putat Tiruvantāti (Sacred Linked Verses of Wonder) at 101 verses, five verses explicitly refer to Śiva as the fearsome beggar, most of them registering the deity’s alterity from and yet connection to the ordinary social world, such as in the following:

Whenever you go begging

across this world,

see that you remove

the menacing cobra you bear;

or else chaste women,

fearful of the venomous

ornament dancing on your head,

will not offer alms. (A r putat Tiruvantāti 57)

In terms of the small number of verses explicitly describing this form (though there are several others that describe Śiva as wearing a garland of bones, which evokes the form), the fearsome beggar is a minor character in her poetry.Footnote 12 Much more celebrated in her longest poem is Śiva’s iconography of protector drawn from mythological sources, such as the Bearer of the Gaṅga, the Destroyer of the Triple Cities, and the Bearer of Poison, in which he saves the world from harm. And yet the beggar is a significant form in her poetry, as the site of humankind’s fears.

It is the register of fear that comes to the fore in her short poems on Tiruvālaṅkāṭu, which read as though they are an eyewitness account of being at the cremation ground; this effect is achieved by her poetic style of making the first part of a given verse describe the scene at the cremation ground, while the second part of the verse locates Śiva as a dancer in the midst of that scene. The two parts are not usually equal; in most verses there is much more of a description of the context than of the deity.

On ground moistened by melted fat,

ghouls (pēy) of hollowed eyes and long teeth

violently perform the tuṇaṇkai dance around the burning ground;

when they see the pyes have extinguished

they crowd to gorge gleefully on the corpses

to their hearts’ content.

Here in this frightful burning ground,

bearing fire in his palm,

the beautiful lord dances. (Tiruvālaṅkāṭut Tiruppatikam 2.2)

This cremation ground is menacing, with its thorny flora and predatory fauna, its grotesque ghouls acting erratically and then lunging to feast on scorched human flesh. As the dancer, Śiva is lord of that domain and yet seemingly unaffected by it as the “beautiful one who dances,” a phrase that Tiruvālaṅkāṭṭut Tiruppatikam 2 uses as a refrain in four of its eleven verses.

The poet knows, however, that the dancer is not separate from the beggar:

Without explanation

our lord wanders everywhere

begging for sundry offerings,

then dances in the cremation ground

in the deepest night;

we want to know why he does this,

but what can we say now?

Should we see him one day

we shall ask him. (A r putat Tiruvantāti 25)

Both the fearsome and the beautiful have the same source in Śiva; this is what the women in their homes who are afraid of his cobra, as well as others in the social world, cannot see. That knowledge can only be obtained by exploratory human experience, which is the key to a devotional subjectivity in Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s bhakti poetry. Exploration characterizes both her praise of and questions to Śiva and, specific to the hymns on Tiruvālaṅkāṭu, her encounter with him in the cremation ground. In common with Śaiva Tantrism, the poet affirms that the cremation ground is the home of Śiva and a place of radical transformation. Going to the cremation ground precipitates a visceral experience of both the horror of death and the beauty of the divine as cosmic overlord.

Yet unlike Tantra, which requires elaborate ritual procedures for self-transformation, bhakti is oriented towards experiences that are accessed by ordinary means, even if they are not customary experiences, such as venturing into the cremation ground: No formal initiation is necessary. If, as the Gita teaches, confrontation with death is both the catalyst for and method of true understanding of bhakti, how would someone who is not a warrior go about getting that experience? In society at large, death is a frequent occurrence, and the socially-designated anti-social cremation ground is thus a known place to encounter death; in this is resembles the battlefield, though it is of course distinct in its lack of explicitly assumed politics and heroism.

Once at the cremation ground, the emphasis as represented in Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s hymns on Tiruvālaṅkāṭu is to observe—to feel out the horror through detailed and lasting observation, and not to practice rituals that would divert one’s attention from context and deity. Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār is not doing rituals to ‘become’ Śiva or Śiva-like; the distance between human and divine is maintained through the observer’s stance. What she describes can be understood as an immersion experience of the intersection between the finite and the non-finite; the boundary between nāṭu and kāṭu is not a wall but instead a living hedge of chaparral. It takes the embodied experience of simultaneous confrontation by both the finite (corpses) and the infinite (the Dancing Śiva) to get the radical transformative meaning. Remaining in the cremation ground sublimates human subjectivity into a devotional subjectivity. Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār does not imagine this process as the ability to accomplish supernatural effects (siddhiḥ), but instead as a moment of profound awareness of humankind’s true nature. Deriving meaning from unscripted encountered experience is the way of the bhakti poet; enacting meaning through scripted experience is the way of the Tantric ritualist.


By viewing the cremation ground as invested with religious meaning and spending time there, Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār evokes the spiritually liberatory practices of the Atimārga sects and their continued development in the Mantramārga or Śaiva Tantra. Perhaps she was one of a number of women who ventured to the cremation ground, since the Mantramārga, in contrast to the Atimārga sects’ emphasis on Brahmin males, was open to all castes and to women.Footnote 13 And yet she provides her own interpretation of established tradition. For example, she encounters the Dancing Śiva at the cremation ground, not Bhairava, although she does connect the two forms in her poetry. And as I mentioned, her poetry does not describe rituals, in contrast to the centrality of rituals in Tantra, from dīkṣā (initiation) to practices of ritualized sex, which David White (2003) considers to be unique to Tantra, and to ritual divinization of the body, which Gavin Flood (2006) considers to be Tantra’s special feature.

Intriguingly, the socially-challenging aspects of both Tantra and bhakti became circumscribed by society in the medieval period. Tantra split into the ‘right-handed’ Siddhāntin sector, which ran temple culture, and the ‘left-handed’ non-Saiddhāntika sector, which performed rituals to protect the state though reworking rituals performed in the cremation ground (Sanderson 2013: 214). The three famous male Tamil Śiva-bhakti poet-saints (Appar, Campantar and Cuntarar), who composed hymns to Śiva in the 7th and 8th centuries, on occasion described Śiva as dancing in the cremation ground, though they did so from a perspective of pilgrimages to named towns (nāṭu), rather than from a location in cremation grounds (kāṭu).Footnote 14 Revealingly, in Tamil Śiva-bhakti’s authoritative development, there was a conspicuous attempt to erase any association with the cremation ground. For example, in his twelfth-century biographies of all of the bhakti saints, Cēkkilār describes Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār as the perfect society woman—beautiful, in a wealthy merchant family, and devoted to Śiva—whose devotion required that she leave society to become one of Śiva’s ghoulish entourage in ‘the resplendent town’ of Tiru Ālaṅkāṭu. He quotes from the poet but conspicuously leaves out any of her references to the burning ground (kāṭu): In his telling, her body itself becomes anti-social through her becoming a ghoul, replacing her own vision of her embodied experience as a challenge to social convention. Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s vision is of a porous boundary between life and death, such that the experience of the finite and the non-finite constitute a devotional subjectivity, which she practiced at least in part at the cremation ground. In contrast, her biographer redraws the solid boundary between nāṭu and kāṭu, and life and death, eschewing their generative interaction.

Perhaps bhakti’s developing success in creating an image of itself as a mainstream and accessible path ultimately served to conceal or even marginalize Tantra. Writing about the 17th century praise-poem Sarvāparādhastotra in Nepal, Bronwen Bledsoe theorizes that King Pratāp deployed bhakti as “the public face” of Tantra: The King’s articulation of his relationship with the Tantric Goddess Taleju “in the verbal medium and in the public realm required Tantra’s paraphrase or overlay, and the bhakti brand of intimacy was eminently suitable for purposes of display. Bhakti added an exoteric and aesthetic dimension to the relationship without compromising its secret core” (Bledsoe 2000: 200). Patton Burchett argues that in early modern north India, the dominant rise of Vaiṣṇava bhakti depended on the “marginalization of formerly dominant tantric religious paradigms,” which was achieved by the profusion of poetic and hagiographic bhakti literature that depicted “the effectiveness of bhakti and the powerlessness of tantra-mantra” (Burchett 2013: 1, 10).

Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s bhakti image of Śiva was not that of the temple-dwelling, majestic Śiva who presides over fertile cultivated lands in Tamil country, and pre-dated these types of expressions found in the poetry of the three famous male saints and the medieval biographies of the saints composed by Cēkkilār. The move to beautify Śiva and his dwellings was not yet a public mandate, although there are harbingers in her poetry in the form of allusions to discomfort with the god’s frightful appearance (Pechilis 2011: 63–5). Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s poetically-depicted physical encounter with Śiva at the cremation ground suggests that in her era there was a generative fluidity between bhakti and Tantra that served as an impetus to new explorations in imaging a relationship between humankind and the divine. In my earlier work (Pechilis 2011: 41), I characterized her poetry as “off-bhakti” in contrast to the socialized later Tamil Śiva-bhakti poems and biographies; for reasons I have described here, I now think that Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār’s daring engagement with Tantric practices and meanings significantly contributed to her distinctive bhakti path, insofar as they provided a context for her to develop her vision of an unscripted encounter with the divine at the cremation ground. This basic premise of her vision—unscripted encounter—established a generative cornerstone for bhakti and can be seen in the pilgrimages of the three famous male saints, as well as the dramas of the domestically-tinged biographies of the saints, in spite of their displacement of kāṭu with nāṭu.


  1. Of note is that Lorenzen (1972: 83–95) discusses “Kāpālika Bhakti,” based on his definition of bhakti as “personal devotion to a personal god,” but this definition of bhakti is problematic as I have discussed (Prentiss 1999: 17–24).

  2. All translations from her poetry are from Pechilis 2011.

  3. Rajendra Chola (1012–1044) copper plates in South Indian Inscriptions,

  4. Pur. 238, transl. Hart and Heifetz 1999: 148 (this is an excerpt from the poem). See also Pur. 237, 240, 359. Hart discusses the conventional reasons for dating the bulk of the early Tamil Caṅkam poetry to 100 to 250 CE in his “Introduction” in the volume, p. xvi. Already in this early poetry we see that the burial/cremation ground is situated in the forest (kāṭu), removed from human habitation.

  5. Pur. 250 & 245, respectively; see also 246, 247, 251.

  6. I discuss the significance of her vision of Śiva as the lord of time at the cremation ground for the development of the icon of the dancing Śiva (Naṭarāja) in Pechilis 2013.

  7. Pechilis 2011: 51–53. These images predominate in her two longer poems, the A r putat Tiruvantāti (Sacred Linked Verses of Wonder) at 101 verses and the Tiru Iraṭṭai Maṇimālai (Sacred Garland of Double Gems) at 20 verses.

  8. He refers to the use of the phrases such as ‘entirely devoted to Śiva’ in inscriptions, competition for patronage, and indicates that “Jaina, brahmanical, and Buddhist literary evidence” can be found in “the longer version of this [2013] essay.”

  9. Sanderson 2013: 212. He says that the Earliest text of Mantramārga is Niśvāsamūla of 450-550 CE (p. 213).

  10. Described in Lorenzen 1972: 73–95; he discusses the likelihood of the Kāpālika ritual practice of human sacrifice.

  11. On the Brahmayāmala, see also the dissertation study by Shaman Hatley, “The Brahmayamalatantra and early Saiva cult of yoginis” (2007; Dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI3292099); and the project on the text being conducted by the Centre for Tantric Studies at the Universität Hamburg,

  12. The other verses are A r putat Tiruvantāti 25, 43, 56, and 74.

  13. Sanderson 2013: 213. He notes that “there is some evidence in the epigraphic record that there were also some female Atimārgic ascetics,” citing Indian Antiquary 11, pp. 220–223. Lorenzen (1972: 13) suggests the same: “The Prakrit Gāthā-saptaśatī is traditionally ascribed to the first century A.D. Sātavāhana king Hāla but was probably compiled sometime in the third to fifth centuries. It contains a verse describing a ‘new’ female Kāpālikā who incessantly besmears herself with ashes from the funeral pyre of her lover. The word ‘new’ (nava), unless it means simply ‘young’, suggests that her Kāpālika vow was taken at his death. This may well be the earliest reference to the Kāpālika sect,” citing Kāvyamālā edition vs. 408.

  14. Indira Peterson 1989, includes several examples of hymns from the three that explicitly mention Śiva dancing in the burning ground, including Campantar 1.39.1/Vēṭkaḷam; Appar 4.2.6/Atikai Vīraṭṭānam; Campantar 1.134.5/Pariyalūr Vīraṭṭam; Appar 4.92.9/Aiyāru; Campantar 1.46/ Atikai Vīraṭṭānam, as well as poems about Bhikṣāṭana the Beggar (pp. 118–126). Kalidos (1996) also identifies specific hymns from the three about Śiva’s dance in the cremation ground, pp. 27–29.


Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Pechilis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pechilis, K. Bhakti and Tantra intertwined: the explorations of the Tamil Poetess Kāraikkāl Ammaiyār. Int. J. Dharma Studies 4, 2 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: